Here Be Marriage |
A place to think about marriage. The personal essays here relate to the specific experience of the author, and are not meant to suggest, in any way, that there is a "right" or "wrong" way to get married, or that you even should get married. They are merely approaching marriage from the perspective of if you're going to do it, what questions need to be asked and answered? Why "Here Be Marriage?" It's a riff on the old "Here Be Dragons" map tag, and, in a way, marriage is the same sort of mythical thing. |
In a few minutes, Rachel and Bob are going to be pronounced husband and wife. These are excellent words, husband and wife—they lean toward each other, they exist in reference to each other, they link arms. “Wife” especially seems druidic and traditional: like “life” but with the addition of the womanly W. “Husband,” despite its traces of Saxon farming methods, makes me think most of “hatband”—and this seems right, if you imagine a conventional movie image of a man in a 1955 hat, with a nice gray hatband. Not a mobster hat, jus the hat of a good man—a husband. Boyfriends don’t wear hats.
——
So I am very happy that Bob and Rachel are getting married. Bob will be a good husband, and Rachel a good wife. They are proud of each other, and this mutual pride is one of the nicest things you can sense about a couple.
"From “Wedding” by Nicholson Baker, from his collected essays The Size of Thoughts.
David Deida
Some benefits derived from marriage can be secured through domestic partnerships, adoptions, insurance policies, and well-written proxies, directives, and wills (how much tuition could be paid for with the legal fees for all that?), but not all of them. The Defense of Marriage Act prevents federal spousal benefits from going to same-sex couples. More than a thousand federal statutes rely on marriage to define one’s status. If you are a widow of any age caring for a child, and your income falls below a certain level, you may qualify for Social Security benefits based on your late spouse’s earnings (beyond what the child might receive). An unmarried parent would not. You don’t need to be married to be a good parent, but marriage equality protects children by giving parents more tools with which to protect them.
Say that the practical issues could all be worked out, and domestic partnerships could be made more or less equitable. Would that do the trick? This was one of the central questions of Perry v. Schwarzenegger: whether being almost married, but not quite, is good enough.
"Amy Davidson in The Newyorker
Jason Bateman in New York Magazine.
Thoughtful piece by Shane Dingman at The Globe and Mail.
This is bad news for new dads like me who are aware they are not perfect. I am going to fail at something when it comes to raising my son. That’s an uncomfortable truth, but it would be sheer hubris to imagine it won’t ever happen. It could be something big – maybe a failure to properly impart a survival skill he might need – or something as small as a look of disappointment when I don’t know how to help him with a problem. That would be devastating to me, and perhaps plant the seed that maybe dad isn’t a superhero.
His statements are about fatherhood but I think they apply to marriage as well. Knowing you’ll fail, and possibly quite often, is a good thing to share with your partner.